Phil Jones Admits to Global Warming Mistakes

In an article in the The Guardian, Phil Jones has admitted to errors in his science of  Man-Made Global Warming (MBW).  He admits that his process of recording and saving data was lacking.  He also has admitted that there "may" have been warmer periods in the past (e.g. Medieval period) and that there is no "statistical" evidence to recent global warming since 1995.  Yet he still holds on to his belief that the current warming period is unprecedented.  He also does not admit to trying to influencing the peer review process, when an his own email clearly states otherwise.

Therefore, I can now categorically reject Phil Jones as an unbiased scientist.  All of his past and current papers must be held in disrepute.   It will take a full peer review on any future papers to readmit Phil Jones to the scientific community.   It is a sad day for Science when a credentialed member loses the respect of his colleagues.  But Phil Jones has chosen this course of action because he wanted to prove his hypothesis more than finding the truth of his Science.  Peer review, as it is, is not as important as Self-Peer Review.